A Gricean View on Intrusive Implicatures
نویسندگان
چکیده
particular, scalar implicatures are at the heart of a very vigorous current debate about the structure of the interpretative process. However, even if one is convinced that there are conversational implicatures of the standard Gricean sort, one might not be convinced that these two cases are best explained in Gricean terms. The enriched interpretation of coordination, for example, might seem better explained within a general theory of coherence. Questions can also be raised about the standard account of scalar implicatures. Happily for me, the argument I will present below is unaffected by the question of whether these particular cases are correctly analyzed in Gricean terms. The argument I will give is an argument that the principles for the calculation of conversational implicatures are equally applicable to complete utterances with speech act force and to sub-parts of utterances. Whether these principles are actually applied in any specific case is tangential to my argument.
منابع مشابه
Mandatory implicatures in Gricean pragmatics
Gricean implicatures are often viewed as a very weak kind of implication, viz., as optional enrichments of the literal meaning of an utterance. In virtue of being optional, they need not be present on every occasion of utterance, and they can be explicitly denied. Further, if implicatures are viewed as optional enrichments, a false implicature cannot be the reason why an utterance is infelicito...
متن کاملScalar Implicatures: Pragmatic Inferences or Grammar?
This talk discusses the nature of different kinds of scales and controversies over issues on the generation of scalar implicatures, particularly those in complex sentences involving disjunction and another operator in its scope, and so on. The pragmatic position based on Gricean reasoning in opposition to the grammatical position based on alternative semantics and LF syntax employing the exhaus...
متن کاملInvestigating the timecourse of accessing conversational implicatures during incremental sentence interpretation
Many contextual inferences in utterance interpretation are explained as following from the nature of conversation and the assumption that participants are rational. Recent psycholinguistic research has focussed on certain of these 'Gricean' inferences and have revealed that comprehenders can access them in online interpretation. However there have been mixed results as to the time-course of acc...
متن کاملScalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics
The Gricean theory of conversational implicature has always been plagued by data suggesting that what would seem to be conversational inferences may occur within the scope of operators like believe, for example; which for bona fide implicatures should be an impossibility. Concentrating my attention on scalar implicatures, I argue that, for the most part, such observations can be accounted for w...
متن کاملrEfErEntial DEscriptions anD conVErsational iMplicaturEs
The standard Gricean defense of russell in the face of referential uses of descriptions has been to claim that these uses are conversational implicatures. My argument in “The case for referential Descriptions” focused on showing that these uses are not particularized implicatures. I now adapt and develop this argument to show that they are not generalized implicatures nor otherwise pragmatic. I...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007